The Kind of Leaders We Need - Revisited
My hope for the leaders The Episcopal Church will bless and send out
Four years ago, I posted an article that got some attention in the Episcopal Church world. It was titled The Kind of Leaders We Need and was a musing on one of the (many) brick walls I was hitting in terms of church planting in my denomination.
That brick wall was: The Episcopal Church has a missional leadership crisis.
I thought I’d revisit that piece to see if I still agree with it, now that we’re a few years post-pandemic. And I do. But I do want to add a little context before re-sharing the original post.
I attend two churches. The first is my church plant, The Abbey, a community that began our life together as a coffee shop that was open to our neighbors twelve hours a day, six days a week. You can read more about that on my Substack.
My other church is called, a little bit in jest but actually quite sincerely, The Church of Don’t Be a Jerk.
The Church of don’t be a Jerk isn’t actually a church - or, not the way “church” is traditionally defined. It’s a long distance running group. A very slow running group. In fact, if you were to drive by us you might think, “what a happy walking group.”
And “Jerk” is actually a euphemism. Pastor Kelvin (I’m giving him a pseudonym from The Righteous Gemstones) and his husband adopted a preteen-aged son several years ago. The son went to school one day, stood up in front of his sixth grade class and proudly told his fellow students, “My dad is a church planter. He started a church called The Church of Don’t Be an A******!”
After that, we had to adjust our language around the kids.
There are a myriad of articles these days (like this one in the NY Times) comparing group fitness groups to churches, particularly in terms of community bonding and ritual. Our “church” goes even farther - frequently talking about spiritual and religious things, and showing up for one another in some pretty profound ways outside of running days.
There are some consequential differences too that should be admitted - first and foremost the fact that neither Jerks nor Assholes are allowed, whereas, theoretically, in a Christian Church we are intent on forgiveness and reconciliation.
But I digress. The point is, Pastor Kelvin is the kind of leader The Episcopal Church really, desperately needs right now.
Kelvin isn’t actually ordained. There was a brief period of time when he was in training to become a vocational deacon. But he decided that he just didn’t have the time to read a bunch of books about Anglican theology, nor the patience to deal with all the church drama. So instead he owns his own gym, makes clients do box jumps and push ups until they puke, and dispenses spiritual wisdom. While we’re doing weighted lunges across the gym, he tells us everything he’s pondering about the mystical Holy Spirit, what Jesus would make of world politics today, and simple practices for not being a jerk.
For my part, I keep Kelvin up to date on all the juicy Episcopal Church gossip he’s missing by staying out of the drama.
Kelvin’s specialty is working with youth and young adults with disabilities. Watching him coax and motivate these folks to discover their full range of motion, ability and confidence is so beautiful. But he doesn’t stop there. He invites other gym members to come work out with his special needs clients, creating a peer-to-peer culture in which everyone exercises, everyone supports each other, and everyone leaves with their lives and souls richer.
When one of his trainees, an adult man with nonverbal autism, ran his first marathon, Kelvin assembled a group of nearly fifty runners to cross the finish line with him.
FIFTY. That’s equal or more than the average Episcopal Church attendance.
The weekend after George Floyd’s murder, Kelvin gathered over forty runners to jog the Civil Rights Trail in downtown Birmingham.
What would be possible if the church had and blessed more missional church leaders like Kelvin?
With that said, here’s my article from July, 2021.
The Episcopal Church has a missional leadership crisis. Steady decline, swift culture changes and a global pandemic are making it apparent that we are failing to seek out - and in many cases are actively weeding out - the sorts of leaders who could help us navigate this uncertain, post-institutional, post-pandemic age.
In my role with the Presiding Bishop’s office, I have the privilege of meeting many creative, resilient lay and ordained leaders who are motivated to share Good News and community with people who aren’t yet part of the church, and who have been historically underrepresented in our tradition. We need far more of these leaders.
I’ve heard several Bishops and Canons say something to the effect of, the leaders who got us to this moment are not the same kind of leaders who will carry us into the future. So what kind of leaders ARE needed in this moments? These are my personal reflections:
We need leaders who aren’t in love with The Episcopal Church.
Episcopalians are taught that our tradition is beautiful. (I agree). Often we’re also taught that our tradition is superior (more problematic). For example, nhow regularly do you hear the following?
“I just love ______ (fill in the blank… our liturgy, music, that we’re such an inclusive church, that you don’t have to check your brain at the door, etc.)
Over the six years I served on my Diocesan Commission on Ministry, I became increasingly aware that one of the things we expected to hear from our Aspirants was how in love they were with The Episcopal Church. We evaluated their fit for ordained ministry based on how well they would fit into our system, rather than their capacity to lead a community into the next incarnation of its life of faith.
But missional leadership requires a degree of dissatisfaction. Missional leaders must be able to see who isn’t being reached, and what aspects of the tradition aren’t working for their context. They are just as curious, if not more so, about where the Holy Spirit is showing up outside their community as how she appears inside of it. We need leaders who are committed to, but not in love with, our denomination.
We need leaders who love God’s people more than they love the church.
This may seem obvious, but it needs to be said.
One of the downfalls of New Episcopal Communities (church plants) can be when a point leader, or members of their team, think their mission is to create a replica of whatever church community they came from. The problem is, it can feel awfully contrived to try to recreate a white, suburban broad-church worship experience inside the school cafeteria of an urban neighborhood, or vice versa. Missional leaders must know that their task isn’t to give people a specific experience – rather, they are co-creating that experience, often in the moment, with the people God has given them in that time and place.
We need leaders who know what it’s like to be on the margin and who have developed that experience into strong relational and intercultural skills.
Most are familiar with Henri Nouwan’s phrase “the wounded healer.” In this moment, we also need marginalized includers. In other words, who are the people who know what it’s like to be an outsider, and can relate to others who have felt on the outskirts of society or of the church? There are certain leaders whose very lives have prepared them for this work – third culture kids, the children and grandchildren of immigrants, military kids, and those who grew up outside of sexuality and gender norms – to name merely a few. These leaders have been practicing cross cultural translation their whole lives.
When invited to do cross-cultural ministry in the Church, they have the capacity to nurture people in faith who have been historically underrepresented in our denomination, people who have lost interest in organized religious communities – and, by doing so, help us all grow in our communal reflection of the Kingdom.
We need leaders who have the courage to take risks – not just to talk about taking risks.
Missional leadership isn’t a profession; it’s a full bodied and soul-ed leap. It can’t be preached, it must be led by example. One of my friends is an Episcopal priest whose first task as a congregation’s new rector was to help them sell their beloved (but much too expensive) sanctuary and find a new place to worship. When I asked one of their vestry members what had enabled them to make that leap, he said, “We trusted that, if we went off the edge of the cliff, our priest would come with us.”
Every single day, missional leaders face the risk of personal failure, personal financial crisis, and letting down their community. Risk-taking capacity is developed when the leader’s primary motivation is missional, rather than professional.
We need leaders who are people-gatherers.
Note, there’s a difference between people gatherers and people attractors. Attractive, charismatic leaders have the ability to draw people in by their personality, appearance and presence. Others may do this by offering attractive programs, etc. What we need more of are gatherers – leaders both equipped with gifts and vocationally called to gather people into community with others. These leaders are hosts, rather than keynoters or entertainers.
The missional church thinks more in terms of invitation and hospitality than publicly and marketing. We need more leaders who lead through these themes, and practice them in their own lives.
We need leaders who thrive in uncomfortable spaces.
Many Episcopalians consider church to be the one safe, quiet, meditative place they’re invited into during the week. When the world outside is unpredictable and chaotic, church offers ritual and transcendence. This is good… AND we need more leaders who are energized by the challenges of uncertainty, frequent disruption and dis-harmony.
A missional community isn’t “in the groove.” There are no prior established patterns of behavior, no unspoken covenants about how to be together in community, and no expectations for how church is “supposed” to be. A mission field is even more this way. We already have leaders with the ability to tame uncomfortable spaces -what we need more of are leaders with the prophetic eyesight to glimpse and interpret the holy in those spaces while in their chaordic state.
We’ve got to stop waiting for the leaders to come to us, and start seeking them out.
The leaders the Church needs today will typically not show up unsolicited outside a rector’s office hoping to discuss ordination. The Episcopal Church has a recognizable “leadership persona” after all:
relatively well manicured, educated and spoken
professionally or liturgically dressed
calm people who appear wise and pastoral
People “on the inside” who enjoy and are involved in existing ministries of their parish
None of these are negative qualities at all! It’s just that folks who know they don’t match the stereotypical description won’t always offer themselves for leadership. They also won’t necessarily be tapped for leadership or, as is frequently the case, they’ll be weeded out of potential leadership roles because they don’t match the persona – unless we begin to actively seek out people with the gifts and characteristics the church needs.
Thank you for this thoughtful and challenging piece. And excellent reminder of why I am where I am.
Thanks for reminding me why I continually need to remember that the little critical voice inside me is not right or holy! That is, trying to validate how we are authentically and truly "church" is not helpful in a missional context within the fringes of society.